Beauty » eption that doesnt one to mind, bu

Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn. Nike NFL Jerseys China .ca! Hi Kerry, As a fellow ref, and one was always compared to you (because of my hair) I ask you this; prior to the recent change in what constitutes a hooking penalty where just touching a player in the midsection can result in a hooking call, my criteria in calling a hook was: Did it impede the players progress? Did it cause a change of possession? Did it cause an injury? Did it materially affect the game? If not, then I wouldnt call it. There may be an exception that doesnt one to mind, but essentially, thats what I chose to do. In the game last night leading up to the winning goal, Jaromir Jagr reached in and clearly hooked Evgeni Malkin (in my opinion), resulting in a change of possession. You could tell because as Malkin was pushing with his legs to take off with the puck and as Jagr reached in with his stick and pulled, Malkins body position went from leaning forward in a driving forward motion to being erect and his forward progress was obviously altered by that action. He lost the puck to Jagr as a result of that hook. Jagr was closer to his offensive zone. Because of that hook, when he snagged the puck, he was closer to the Penguin goal than Malkin was and it gave him an advantage which he used to start the play for the winning goal. So finally, my question...even in an OT playoff game, should a hook have been called? Bill Totten --- Kerry, Thank you for the insight you give us everyday and the thought process you give us of an NHL referee. Last night on the Boston Bruins overtime goal there was a clear hook on Evgeni Malkin by Jaromir Jagr. Jagrs stick was to the midsection of Malkin and there was also a tug which led to the Bruins coming back and getting the winner. All year long including the playoffs we have seen far less hooks be called for a penalty. Why was this not called? Shouldnt the same rules be applied regardless if its the first period or OT? By calling the game differently in OT then it would be in the first arent they ruining the integrity of the game? Thank you,Angelo Vamvakas Bill and Angelo: The is no way anyone can put a positive spin on the non-call (video link) in double overtime that turned the puck over and resulted in the game winning goal by Patrice Bergeron of Boston. As both of you alluded to, Jaromir Jagr clearly reached and hooked Evgeni Malkin through the hands and then up under the armpit. As Jagr pulled back with his stick, Malkins forward progress was stalled, stutter-stepped and his body twisted from the hook. Jagr then gained possession of the puck and reversed the flow on the attack to set up the game-winning goal. The expectation is (and should be) that obvious infractions will be called at any time of the game. There was give and take in this hard fought game and both sides gained some advantages from a generous standard of enforcement that was extended to them. Once players enter a relative comfort zone that the Refs are allowing them to play and anything short of a scoring opportunity or a puck shot over the glass will be called they often take advantage of everything they can. This turnover of the puck was at the red line; just short of 100 feet from either goal. Jagr gambled that he could get away with the hook in double overtime. His leap of faith paid off for him and the Boston Bruins as they took a commanding 3-0 lead in the series. Since the play took place at the red line and on a puck carrier (which is a visual transition zone for the Refs) it would be next to impossible if at least one Referee was not focused directly on the action. Its even highly probable that four eyes would have had a look at the play from different vantage points. The Referee on the same side of the ice in the Penguins zone (trailing Malkin) might have had an obstructed view looking through Jagrs back as the hook was administered. Theoretically, the best view would be drawn with an angle on the play by the lead Ref on the opposite side of the ice. Perhaps neither Ref had a clear sightline on the play. If that was the case, one or both of them should have! I can appreciate the pressure the Officials feel as the game extends into double OT. Every decision they make is crucial and magnified at this point of the game. No Ref wants to be accused of making a weak call that decides the game. Also keep in mind, penalties were being called in both overtime periods. In the first extra period, coincidental minor penalties were called on Milan Lucic and Matt Cooke followed by power play opportunities when Chris Kelly was whistled for tripping and Brooks Orpik for high-sticking before Evgeni Malkin got the automatic delay of game for shooting the puck over the glass. Boston was assessed a too many men on the ice near the start of the second overtime period. Most likely no one remembers these calls or that the Referees were performing their duties as expected. What will be remembered, at least by the Penguins and their fans, is the old school attitude of letting the players decide the outcome of the game that crept back last night; if only for just one non-call. Following the 2004-05 lockout, the expectation was for a more consistent standard to be implemented; especially on restraining fouls. The new way dictated that a Referee would get in less trouble for what he called as opposed to what he didnt. This held true last night in Boston. Bill and Angelo, the Referees have to make a call such as this at anytime throughout the game. When they do, they need to be supported by the entire hockey community. Lets not ever hear again the old adage to, "let the players decide the outcome of the game." Nike NFL Jerseys Cheap . 24 Baylor in a Big 12 clash between teams trending in opposite directions. Andrew Wiggins made 10-of-12 from the foul line and scored 17 for Kansas (14-4, 5-0 Big 12), which capped a stretch of four straight games against ranked opponents unscathed. Fake Nike NFL Jerseys .2 billion agreement with Rogers Communications for the leagues broadcast and multimedia rights. https://www.chinajerseysnfl.us/ . PETERSBURG, Fla. Jose Mourinho could only stand and watch on Sunday as his Manchester United side were humiliated on his Premier League return to Stamford Bridge.The Portuguese maestro is still regarded as a Chelsea legend after guiding the club into uncharted territory, and admitted that it would be hard to keep his emotions under control in the build up to the game.However, things could be much worse -- here are five of the most shockingly bad managerial returns in football.Pep GuardiolaDear oh dear, where do we start with Pep Guardiola? Barcelona have dished out two counts of revenge on their ex-boss.The first came on?May, 6 2015, when he returned to the Nou Camp as an opposing manager with Bayern Munich. His side were thrashed 3-0 -- thanks to a late Lionel Messi brace in the?Champions League semifinal.Guardiola gave it another go in the Champions League group stage with his Manchester City side on?19 October 2016, only for the English side to lose out 4-0. Messi with a hat trick, this time.Harry RedknappHarry Redknapps shock switch across the south coast from Portsmouth to Southampton in 2004 has been described as one of the biggest betrayals in English football.There was absolutely no way Portsmouth were letting Redknapp leave with anything on his return to Fratton Park, as they hammered their fiercest rivals 4-1 on?April, 24 2005.?Just to rub salt in the wound for Southampton fans, Redknapp lead the club to Premier League relegation that season, and then made the switch back to Portsmouth. Bizarre.David MoyesEveryone is aware of David Moyes miserable tenure at the helm of Manchester United. However, not everyone remembers the wonderfully ironic way in which he was sacked.His last game before United pulled the plug was on April, 20 2014, a 2-0 loss at Everton, the club where he spent 11 years as manager.George GrahamArsenal and?George Graham achieved great success together in the nine years they spent together between 1986 and 1995.He led them to two First Diviision titles, two League Cups, one FA Cup and one?UEFA Cup Winners Cup but was sacked?after it was discovered he had accepted an illegal ￡425,000 payment over a player in 1992. NFL Jerseys China. After serving a year long ban form the FA, Graham ended up at Leeds United, and returned to Highbury on?October, 26 1996 where Arsenal ran out as 3-0 winners.Glenn HoddleGlenn Hoddle is best known for his time at Tottenham as a player, but he later managed the north London side between 2001 and 2003.Inbetween he had a stint at Chelsea as a player manager, guiding them to an FA Cup final in 1994.?He didnt enjoy the best of returns to Stamford Bridge as Tottenham manager, with Chelsea running out as 4-0 winners on?March, 13 2002.But it doesnt always go wrong...Tim Sherwood was sacked by Spurs, only to return to White Hart Lane as Aston Villa boss and grind out a 1-0 win on April 11, 2015.Sam Allardyce is something of a legend at Bolton Wanderers, having managed them from 1999 to 2007. Having moved to Newcastle United, the fixture list saw him return to Greater Manchester within a week. It was a happy return, his new side running out comfortable 3-1 winners.Paul Lambert likes going back, too. His Norwich side thrashed Colchester 5-0 in Jan. 2010. Incidentally, five months earlier in the reverse fixture, Lamberts Colchester had stuck seven past Norwich -- a result that probably got him the Carrow Road job. Having left Norwich to manage Aston Villa, Lambert returned to Norwich in Dec. 2012 and won 4-1.And sometimes going wrong can still work out alright...Liverpool legend Kenny Dalglish returned to Anfield on the final day of the 1994-1995 season with his title-chasing Blackburn Rovers. They fluffed their lines, losing 2-1, but it didnt matter because rivals Manchester United had drawn 1-1 at West Ham to hand the trophy to the Ewood Park club. ' ' '